Swift Fox vs Preseem
Preseem is a good product. It popularized fq_codel-based QoE shaping in the WISP industry, and its TCP latency analytics are useful — that's exactly why we built the same queueing and latency analytics directly into Swift Fox. This page lays out the differences so you can decide what fits your network. If we get a fact wrong, tell us and we'll fix it.
Choose Preseem if…
You want QoE analytics and shaping as a standalone add-on and you're happy keeping your existing billing and monitoring tools. It's a mature, focused product that does that job well.
Choose Swift Fox if…
You want the same fq_codel shaping built into your billing and monitoring platform — plus things no QoE appliance does: MPLS auto traffic balancing, tier-fair congestion shaping, full network monitoring with paging, DDoS mitigation, and CGNAT.
Inline appliance vs. out-of-band control
Preseem sits in the data path. An appliance (theirs or your own hardware) is installed inline at your network edge; your customer traffic flows through it, where it's measured and shaped. This is a proven design, and Preseem's per-flow metrics come directly from that vantage point.
Swift Fox is out-of-band by default. A small "pingbox" (VM, cloud, or embedded device) monitors your network over a secure tunnel, and shaping, latency analysis, and captive portals are executed by your existing MikroTik edge router. MikroTik v7 supports fq_codel, so Swift Fox automates managing those queues, and TCP latency is measured from ACK timing without touching the data path. Nothing sits inline, so the platform can never become a single point of failure, and there's no appliance to size, upgrade, or fail over as you grow.
For networks without a MikroTik edge, our Pathbox appliance (currently in early access) delivers the same features as a plug-in inline device. The philosophical difference is that with Preseem, inline is the architecture, while with Swift Fox it's an option.
Neither design is "wrong." Inline gives Preseem direct flow visibility; out-of-band gives Swift Fox zero data-path risk and lets the same measurements drive routing decisions — which is how features like MPLS auto-balancing become possible.
What each platform does
| Capability | Preseem | Swift Fox |
|---|---|---|
| fq_codel QoE shaping to plan rates | Yes | Yesbuilt into billing packages |
| Per-subscriber latency & QoE metrics | Yesmature cross-vendor dashboards | Yesreal-time TCP latency analysis |
| Tier-fair shaping during backhaul congestion | Per-AP capacity management | Yes — PFOany bottlenecked backhaul or AP; every tier keeps the same % of paid speed |
| Plug and Play Setup | Yesgraphing and shaping requires limited initial setup | —network infrastructure must be configured on the network map, but we'll help you do it with 2 hour free onboarding |
| Backhaul capacity measurement (signal / MCS / throughput) | — | Yesplus automated TCP speedtests between MikroTik routers |
| MPLS auto traffic balancing (RSVP-TE) | — | Yesunique to Swift Fox |
| Full NMS: per-CPE ping history, paging, on-call rotations | —QoE-focused alerting but no ICMP | Yesevery device, every minute, history forever |
| DDoS detection & BGP blackholing | — | Yes |
| Carrier-grade NAT management | — | Yes |
| Billing, invoicing & card processing | Integrates with third-party billingSonar, Visp, Splynx, UCRM & others | Optional tieralso integrates with Sonar, UCRM & Visp if you keep them |
| Customer portal with self-service reconnect | — | Yes |
| Hosted PBX / call centre / ticketing | — | Optional tier |
| Inline appliance in the data path | Requiredappliance or your own hardware | Optionalout-of-band with a MikroTik edge; inline Pathbox available for other networks |
| Pricing (USD, under 5000 subscribers) | $0.90 / sub / moIncl Fixed Wireless Add-On $200 monthly minimum | $0.75 / sub / mo$50 monthly minimum, includes monitoring & automation |
| Free trial | 30 days | 30 dayswith 2 hours of free onboarding |
Preseem information sourced from preseem.com as of July 2026. Preseem is a trademark of its respective owner; Swift Fox Systems is not affiliated with Preseem. If anything here is outdated or inaccurate, email us and we'll correct it promptly.
What the whole stack costs
Preseem does one job, so most WISPs run it alongside a billing platform and a monitoring tool. The fair comparison is what the whole stack costs. Example at 1,000 subscribers:
Typical multi-tool stack
- QoE shaping~$900 / mo
- Billing & CRM platform~$1,500–2,500 / mo
- Network monitoring tool~$200–400 / mo
- Ticketing / PBX~$150–300 / mo
Swift Fox — Network + Billing + Call Centre
- QoE shaping (PFO, built in)included
- Billing, portal & card processingincluded
- Full NMS + MPLS auto-balancingincluded
- Hosted PBX, ticketing & schedulingincluded
Prefer to keep your billing system? The Network Management tier ($750/mo at this size) replaces the QoE appliance and the monitoring tool, adds MPLS auto-balancing, DDoS protection, and CGNAT — and integrates with Sonar, UCRM and Visp for disconnects.
Frequently asked questions
Is Swift Fox's shaping really equivalent to Preseem's?
Can I run Swift Fox and Preseem together?
I use Sonar, UCRM or Visp for billing. Do I have to switch?
What do I need on my network to get started?
Who builds Swift Fox?
See PFO shape a saturated backhaul, live
Book a 20-minute demo and bring your gnarliest congestion scenario. No slide deck — just the product, and the person who built it.
Questions first? [email protected] · 1-866-779-1608